Skip to main content
All insights
Diagnostic Innovation

Liquid Biopsy in Leukemia: Promise and Limits

Liquid biopsy attracts interest because it can investigate biological material in a fluid sample. In leukemia, its usefulness must be evaluated against a specific disease, specimen and clinical or research question.

By CellSight Editorial TeamOriginally published Updated 2 min read
Conceptual closed sample tube beside an abstract glass spiral on a softly lit laboratory surface.
Original AI-generated editorial illustration; not a clinical image, result, or photograph of CellSight facilities.

What does the term mean?

The National Cancer Institute describes liquid biopsy as testing blood or another body fluid for cancer cells or material released from them. Cell-free DNA includes DNA fragments in the fluid; the tumour-derived portion is commonly called circulating tumour DNA. These terms are related but not interchangeable. [1]

A blood draw is minimally invasive. Calling it completely non-invasive, or describing it as a replacement for every tissue or marrow assessment, overstates what the term establishes.

A defined example from AML research

Hupe and colleagues evaluated plasma cell-free DNA in 15 patients with isolated extramedullary AML manifestations. They compared molecular findings across plasma, marrow and peripheral-blood cell samples. The study reported that plasma DNA captured relevant mutations in that specific setting. Its small, selected cohort does not establish performance across all people with leukemia. [2]

This is a useful research example because it asks where different sample types may provide complementary information. It should not be generalized into a universal screening claim.

Interpretation depends on method and context

MRD assessment has technical and reporting requirements. European LeukemiaNet's foundational AML consensus emphasizes that technique, specimen and timing matter when interpreting results. [3]

For readers comparing studies, ask whether the same biological target and reference standard were used. Also distinguish detecting a molecular signal from proving that a change in management improves outcomes.

Where AI fits in the discussion

Our view is that computational methods should be evaluated against a defined task and dataset, rather than assumed to improve every assay. Combining molecular and imaging information is a research question that needs its own evidence.

CellSight follows these developments as external scientific context. This article does not claim that its working first version performs liquid biopsy or provides molecular diagnostic testing.

References

  1. 1. Definition of liquid biopsy. National Cancer Institute. Undated dictionary entry. Accessed 2026-09-14.
  2. 2. Cell-free DNA for detection and monitoring of extramedullary AML relapse. Hupe et al., HemaSphere. 2025-03-10. Accessed 2026-09-14.
  3. 3. 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Heuser et al., Blood. 2021-12-30. Accessed 2026-09-14.

Related Insights

Diagnostic Innovation

Advances in Leukemia Detection and Monitoring

Understand how molecular testing, flow cytometry, liquid-biopsy research and digital imaging contribute different evidence to leukemia investigations.

By CellSight Editorial Team · September 13, 2026 · 2 min read

Read article